Keamanan Nasional dalam Konsep dan Standar Internasional

Indah Amaritasari

Abstract


Kemanan nasional sebagai suatu konsepsi yang dikeluarkan AS pada saat Perang Dingin memeliki asosiasi yang sangat erat dengan pendekatan militer sebagai suatu pendekatan tradisional. Dengan berakhirnya Perang Dingin, konsepsi keamanan nasional mengalami perubahan dan perkembangan akibat perubahan lingkungan strategis yang terus berkembang. Perubahan cukup signifikan terjadi terutama dalam hubungannya dengan perang melawan terorisme. Karena itu, konsep keamanan nasional yang lahir pada masa perang dingin menjadi tidak relevan dan ambigu diartikan untuk konteks saat ini. Dengan metoda analitikal terhadap deskriptif empiris, tulisan ini mendiskusikan persoalan perubahan konsepsi kemanan nasional dan bagaimana hukum internasional terutama hak asasi manusia melihat hal ini.


Keywords


Keamanan Nasional, Perang dingin dan HAM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berkowitz, Morton, and Bock, P.G, eds. American National Security. New York: Free Press, 1965.

B. Buzan, O. Wæver and J. de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1998, pp. 23-26.

B. Saul, Defining Terrorism in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).

Cohen, Ira S., and Tuttle, Andrew C. National Security Affairs: A Syllabus. 1972.

Emmerson, Ben, “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Framework principles for securing the human rights of victims of terrorism, United Nations General Assembly (2012)

Friesendorf, Cornelius; International Intervention and the Use of Force: Military and Police Roles; Geneva: A Center for Security, Development, and the Rule of Law, 2012).

Graebner, A. Norman; “Introduction: The Source of Postwar Insecurity”; dalam buku National Security: Its Theory and Practice 1945-1960; New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

Hermann, Charles; “Are the dimensions and implications of national security changing?” Mershon Center Quaterly Report 3, no. 1 (Autumn 1977)

Ikle, Fred C. “Can nuclear deterrence last out the century?” Foreign Affairs 51, no. 2 (1973): 267-85.

Kearney, Donal; “What does ‘national security’ actually mean? Diunduh di

Krishner, Jonathan; Globalisation and National Security, (New York: Taylor&Francis Group).

Lasswell, Horold D., and Kaplan, Abraham. Power and Security. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1950.

Lihat, e.g., K. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House, 1979; T. Shelling, Arms and Influence, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966; H. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Aldred A. Knoft, 1950.

McNamara, Robert S. The Essence of Security. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.

M & Others v Russia (Aplikasi no. 41416/08) ECHR [2011].

Nasu, Hitoshi; The expanded conception of security and international law: Challenges to the UN collective security system; Amasterdam Law Forum at

Stanley Hoffman,“Clash of Globalizations,”ForeignAffairs, 81(4)(July/August 2002).

Taylor, Maxwell D. Precious Secuirity. New York: Norton, 1976.

United Kingdom government “A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy” (London) [2010] United Kingdom government “A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy” (London) [2010].

United States government, National Security Strategy (Washington: 2010) diunduh di http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf

Wolfers, Arnold.“National Secuirty’ As an Ambigous Symbol.” dalam American Defense and Détente ed. Eugene J. Rosi. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1973.

W. M. Reisman, ‘In Defense of World Public Order’, American Journal of International Law 2001-95.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i2.21

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Keamanan Nasional

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.